Blog » 5 REASONS FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY
5 REASONS FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY
22 November 2016
One of the largest business risk is an employee who leaves the company with the information and know how acquired during his employment. Business owners should think about protecting their business in advance, before it is too late. We summarize the key points of non-compete clauses under Hungarian law in this résumé.
The pros of a non-compete clause
As a business owner, or CEO, you should use non-compete clauses when you sign labour contract with your key staff members, because:
- you can avoid losing key customers when an employee goes to a competitor or starts a competing firm;
- high-performing employees would far less likely to put their skills at your competitor’s disposal in case of end of labour relationship;
- your market is protected more effectively in this way;
The Labour Code provides low-level protection
According to the Hungarian Labour Code your employee can not compromise the employer’s business interests during the employment relationship. This means that your employee cannot work for your competitor, he cannot found a company with the same business activity, etc.
This is a general rule with a vague content, and the devil is always in the details: the Labour Code does not define who is your competitor, what is competing activity, and more importantly, what kind of sanctions can you use if your employer endangers the company’s business interest.
Practical advice: If you want to protect your business efficiently during employment and more importantly, after the labour relationship ends, you have to insert a specific non-compete clause into the labour contracts that defines the key elements of a non-competition obligation.
The key elements of a non-compete clause
The non-competition clause that you use should address at least the following issues:
- what is your business activity that you want to protect?
- what kind of activities do you want to be protected from?
- what is the time frame and territorial scope of the protection?
- what is the compensation for the non-compete obligation?
- what kind of sanctions can you use in case of infringement?
Practical advice: instead of using non-compete clause that binds excessively the employee, by prohibiting too wide range of activities for a quite long period, try to focus on the markets and activities that are really important for your business.
The business protected
The competitive business activity shall be defined precisely, since you cannot validly prohibit an engineer to work as an engineer at another construction firm or prevent a sales manager from selling every kind of goods.
In the meantime you can prohibit them for working for the firms that provide similar service for the same customers, or from being employed by the company that sells a competing product ,etc.
The territory protected
The non-compete agreement shall be reasonable in scope, that means that the geographic scope should not be broader than necessary to protect the company’s business. For some businesses a geographic scope that is countrywide may be reasonable, while for other business a one mile radius is all that is reasonable.
Period of protection
Under Hungarian Labour Code a non-compete clause can be concluded for fixed period, for no more than 2 years after the termination of employment. It is important that this period cannot be lengthened.
Compensation - proportionality
The compensation paid to the employee must be appropriate and proportional so that the non-compete clause to be legally valid and enforceable.
The compensation may not be less than the 33 % of the salary of the employee for the preceding period. In other words, in case you want to bind your employee for a 1-year-period after end of employment you can not pay less than 4 (four) months’ salary.
When it comes to the proportionality of the compensation, the length, the territorial scope and the range of prohibited activities comes into consideration. A 24 months’ non-competition clause with a worldwide territorial protection for the minimum 8 months’ salary is scarcely a valid agreement from legal point of view.
Practical advice: when calculating the compensation, all of the elements above shall be taken into account, and the golden rule “the less is more” applies.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »