Blog » 5 REASONS FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY
5 REASONS FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY
22 November 2016
One of the largest business risk is an employee who leaves the company with the information and know how acquired during his employment. Business owners should think about protecting their business in advance, before it is too late. We summarize the key points of non-compete clauses under Hungarian law in this résumé.
The pros of a non-compete clause
As a business owner, or CEO, you should use non-compete clauses when you sign labour contract with your key staff members, because:
- you can avoid losing key customers when an employee goes to a competitor or starts a competing firm;
- high-performing employees would far less likely to put their skills at your competitor’s disposal in case of end of labour relationship;
- your market is protected more effectively in this way;
The Labour Code provides low-level protection
According to the Hungarian Labour Code your employee can not compromise the employer’s business interests during the employment relationship. This means that your employee cannot work for your competitor, he cannot found a company with the same business activity, etc.
This is a general rule with a vague content, and the devil is always in the details: the Labour Code does not define who is your competitor, what is competing activity, and more importantly, what kind of sanctions can you use if your employer endangers the company’s business interest.
Practical advice: If you want to protect your business efficiently during employment and more importantly, after the labour relationship ends, you have to insert a specific non-compete clause into the labour contracts that defines the key elements of a non-competition obligation.
The key elements of a non-compete clause
The non-competition clause that you use should address at least the following issues:
- what is your business activity that you want to protect?
- what kind of activities do you want to be protected from?
- what is the time frame and territorial scope of the protection?
- what is the compensation for the non-compete obligation?
- what kind of sanctions can you use in case of infringement?
Practical advice: instead of using non-compete clause that binds excessively the employee, by prohibiting too wide range of activities for a quite long period, try to focus on the markets and activities that are really important for your business.
The business protected
The competitive business activity shall be defined precisely, since you cannot validly prohibit an engineer to work as an engineer at another construction firm or prevent a sales manager from selling every kind of goods.
In the meantime you can prohibit them for working for the firms that provide similar service for the same customers, or from being employed by the company that sells a competing product ,etc.
The territory protected
The non-compete agreement shall be reasonable in scope, that means that the geographic scope should not be broader than necessary to protect the company’s business. For some businesses a geographic scope that is countrywide may be reasonable, while for other business a one mile radius is all that is reasonable.
Period of protection
Under Hungarian Labour Code a non-compete clause can be concluded for fixed period, for no more than 2 years after the termination of employment. It is important that this period cannot be lengthened.
Compensation - proportionality
The compensation paid to the employee must be appropriate and proportional so that the non-compete clause to be legally valid and enforceable.
The compensation may not be less than the 33 % of the salary of the employee for the preceding period. In other words, in case you want to bind your employee for a 1-year-period after end of employment you can not pay less than 4 (four) months’ salary.
When it comes to the proportionality of the compensation, the length, the territorial scope and the range of prohibited activities comes into consideration. A 24 months’ non-competition clause with a worldwide territorial protection for the minimum 8 months’ salary is scarcely a valid agreement from legal point of view.
Practical advice: when calculating the compensation, all of the elements above shall be taken into account, and the golden rule “the less is more” applies.
Hungary: Steps Towards Differentiating Between Domestic and International Procedural Public Policy
Drawing a well-defined line of demarcation between domestic and international public policy when enforcing foreign arbitral awards sends a clear pro-arbitration message from national courts in any jurisdiction. Does Hungarian case law come close to this level of sophistication? This post analyses this question in the context of procedural public policy, and it does so based on two recent appellate court decisions rendered in the context of enforcement of arbitral awards in accordance with the New York Convention.Read more »
EU ISSUED NEW GDPR STANDARD CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES – WHEN AND HOW TO USE THEM?
During summer 2021, the European Commission published two new "standard contractual clauses" on data protection regulation, which can be applied on the one hand, to the legal relationship between data controllers and data processors covered by the GDPR , and to the transfers of personal data to third countries, on the other. In this article, we answer the questions: what these SCCs regulate, how do they differ from the previous SCCs and how can your company use the new SCCs?Read more »
CAN THE NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT BE VALID WITHOUT A PRECISE COMPENSATION IN HUNGARY?
The non-compete agreement may provide protection of the legitimate economic interests of the employer even after the termination of employment relationship. However, the Hungarian Labour Code lays down strict requirements for the agreement. In our article we analyse a recent decision of the Supreme Court about the importance of the precise determination of the compensation, so you as an employer can conclude a valid non-compete agreement.Read more »