Blog » 5 STEPS TO CONCLUDE AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT IN HUNGARY
5 STEPS TO CONCLUDE AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT IN HUNGARY
26 September 2016
In the world of globalization interconnection agreements between telecommunication operators have growing importance. Efficient interconnection is not only important for customers, but also to enable activities like electronic banking, e-commerce or mobile roaming. If you decided to enter into an interconnection agreement with a Hungarian operator, this short article may be a useful guideline for you.
Registration before the NMHH
In order to enter into an interconnection agreement with a Hungarian operator, you must be a registered telecommunication operator in Hungary. Thus, you must file the registration before the NMHH, which is the Hungarian Infocommunications Authority.
The registration procedure is simplified and user-friendly: if the provided data is correct and complete, within 8 days as of filing the registration form, the Infocommunications Authority will decide about the registration.
The applicant must define the scheduled date of starting the interconnection services and must inform the Authority about the actual starting date. Before starting the services, the operator must file its general terms and conditions to the Authority.
Reference Interconnection Offer
The Authority identifies the operators who have significant market power on the telecommunication market and establishes their obligation to enter into interconnection agreements with other operators.
These SMP operators are obliged to file the so called reference interconnection offer to the Authority. The mandatory content of the reference interconnection offer is regulated by the relevant government decree.
If the Authority approves the content of the reference interconnection offer, the SMP operator shall publish it. After the approval and publication the SMP operator is bound to its reference interconnection offer and cannot deviate from it in the interconnection agreement.
Based on the published reference interconnection offer, you can file a contracting initiative with the SMP operator. You must consider the format and content requirements, because if your initiative does not meet the given criteria, you will be invited to harmonise it, which can slow down the process.
The contracting initiative can only be refused by the SMP operator on two grounds:
- if it would be technically impossible to achieve based on objective technical criteria or
- if the network integrity cannot be maintained.
Otherwise within 10 days as of the day of the receipt of the contracting initiative, the SMP operator shall inform the operator about
- either the staring of the contract negotiations,
- or if the contracting initiative was not technically or economically justified, about the conditions of the reasonable offer.
If the SMP operator fails to respond to the contractive initiative within 30 days as of the day of the receipt, as a main rule, it shall be regarded as accepted, and from legal point of view the interconnection agreement comes into existence.
Negotiations and signing of interconnection agreement
In case the SMP operator finds the contracting initiative suitable for further negotiations, there will be a short and limited negotiation procedure between the parties.
Principally, the negotiation can take only a short time, since based on the relevant government decree, the interconnection agreement must be concluded within 15 (in some cases 30) days as of the receipt of the contracting initiative by the SMP operator.
The playfield of negotiations is very limited, because, as mentioned before, the parties cannot deviate from the reference interconnection offer. Furthermore the SMP operators are obliged to the equal treatment of all operators, thus you cannot negotiate significantly better conditions than your competitor.
Nevertheless, based on our experiences the negotiation procedure can take more months because of technical details (eg. connecting points, etc.).
Within ten days as of the conclusion of the interconnection agreement, the parties must start the installation examination and the testing.
Before starting the testing procedure, the contracting party must provide bank guarantee or security deposit to the SMP operator, in order to cover the costs of connection and eventual future claims arising from breach of contract etc.
The interconnection and the start of the provision of services must be established and allowed by the SMP operator as soon as possible but within a maximum of 30 days from the conclusion of the contract.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »