Blog » DO NOT PLAY THE PAPERS! – 5 MUST-HAVE DOCUMENTS TO BE GDPR COMPLIANT
DO NOT PLAY THE PAPERS! – 5 MUST-HAVE DOCUMENTS TO BE GDPR COMPLIANT
09 March 2018
Last week during a GDPR related meeting with one of our clients, he told us: honestly, I have the feeling that this GDPR project is all about paperwork. Although it is not entirely true, we totally agree with our client that a huge part of the compliance project is drafting and adopting several documents. In this article we summarized the 5 basic types of documents that you must have in order to achieve GDPR-compliance.
1. Records of data processing activities
It is clear from the GDPR that both data controllers and data processors shall maintain a record of processing activities which contains certain information (eg. categories of processed data, data transfers to third countries etc.)
The content of the controllers’ and processors’ records is different: for example, while the records of a controller contain the data detention periods, it is obviously not an element of the processors’ records as he is not the one who establishes these periods.
If during the review of your processing activities you were identified both as a controller and a processor, we have great news for you: you need to maintain two records. For example, the haulier is a controller in relation with his own employees (record 1) but is a processor in relation with the data of his client’s customers (record 2).
2. Internal data protection and data processing policy
The GDPR sets forth that controllers shall implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure the GDPR compliance which include the adoption of data protection policies.
Thus, it is kind of obligatory to adopt an internal data protection policy which describes all data processing activities, the liabilities and tasks in relation with the data protection in the organization, the measurements made in relation with data security, the rights of the data subjects and how to handle their requests.
3. Information „packages”
One of the most important goal of the GDPR was to ensure that data subjects are well informed, they understand what happens with their personal data and they have effective rights in relation with the processing of their data.
4. Data breach incident records
Considering all the information security measures you implemented in order to be GDPR-compliant, you should not experience any data breach incidents at all. However, unfortunately even the best practices cannot exclude the possibility of an incident.
Thus, on a “hope for the best but prepare for the worst” basis you will need to have a data breach incident records. This documents the data breaches, their effects and the actions you have taken to mitigate the risks.
5. Data processing contracts
Regardless that you are a controller or a processor (or both if different contexts) you will need to conclude a (data processing) contract with the other party (processor or controller)
This contract among others clearly sets forth the responsibilities of both parties in relation with the certain processing activities. It is important to mention that the contact shall be in writing (including electronic form).
If you are a processor it is your interest to act in accordance with the data processing contract as otherwise you may be considered as a controller which clearly increases your liabilities.
To sum up the above: GDPR is not only about paperwork but it is clearly a very important and big part of your compliance project. Indeed, if the supervisory authority knocks on your door that he wants to investigate your processing activities, first thing he will tell you is: show me your data protection related documents.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »