Blog » DO NOT SCORE OWN GOAL WITH GDPR – DO YOU ALWAYS NEED CONSENT?
DO NOT SCORE OWN GOAL WITH GDPR – DO YOU ALWAYS NEED CONSENT?
28 May 2018
Do you need re-confirmation of client consent already given in each case because of the GDPR? Before sending thousands of e-mails to clients in your database to obtain their consent again, read our article to avoid throwing the baby out with the bath water!
During last week, as the D-Day of GDPR has been coming closer I received dozens of e-mails from on-line shops, hotels, travel agencies, consultancy firms and the like where I had on-line client account in the past years.
Needless to say, the second approach was more attractive for me. In case of the first type of e-mail, I thought twice whether I really need to maintain my on-line client account before clicking and renewing my consent.
Surveys show that I am not alone with this, and providers who are sending e-mails seeking re-confirmation of consent because of GDPR, face a very low response rate from their clients.
So the question is, which approach should you choose if you would like to be GDPR compliant?
Consent as legal basis
Those, who are seeking the re-confirmation of the consent already given are either unaware of the fact that consent is only one out of the six (6) other legal bases allowed by the GDPR that can serve as valid ground for processing personal data, or they interpret the Regulation too strictly in my opinion.
These data controllers, who are founding the data processing on the consent of data subjects as a legal basis, can easily score an own goal.
Given that “consent” means an activity from the data subject, a not answering customer “says no” to the data processing. This means that you have to stop the sending of any other on-line material, and you shall delete the customer’s on-line account.
Are you sure you want to let this happen?
Legitimate interest as a legal basis
Besides “consent” there is another legal basis which can be a valid ground for processing personal data: the legitimate interest of the data controller company.
This can be a valid ground for data processing, if the data processing is really necessary for the company to pursue its legitimate interest, and these interests are not overridden by the data subject’s fundamental rights.
Consent vs Legitimate interest
It is true that seeking consent is simply and you can do it by sending e-mails, without the involvement of a data protection expert.
At the same time, choosing the legitimate interest as a legal basis means that you have to carry out and document a so-called legitimate interest assessment test which is a mission impossible without a lawyer or other data protection expert.
However, the benefits are clear: in case of seeking re-confirmation of consent, you are risking the loss of the vast majority of your client database.
But in case of you opt for the smarter approach, and with the help of a lawyer or data protection expert, you are able to find a legitimate interest, which permits you to handle the client’s personal data, without risking the client’s fundamental rights, then you will have to simply notify your clients about the change, but you do not need their “consent” again.
Instead scoring an own goal with GDPR, before sending e-mails to your customers obtaining again of their consent, consult a lawyer specialized in data protection law to find the most appropriate way to comply with GDPR and not lose your client database.
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART II. TERMIANTION BASED ON BEHAVIOUR
Although, considering the current labour market in Hungary, employers are trying to keep the employees at the company, there may be situations where the employment relation cannot be maintained due to behaviour or attitude. In our previous article we explained that a dismissal by the employer is far from a simple move, as the legitimate justification must meet a number of criteria. In the present article, we examine the grounds for termination based on the behaviour of the employee.Read more »
CAN YOU FIRE YOUR EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF A BLOGPOST IN HUNGARY ? – STRASBOURG RULED
How to balance between the employer’s business interests and the employee’s right to freedom of expression? Can the employer restrict the employee’s freedom of expression and terminate his employment because of a blogpost? The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) addressed these questions in his fresh judgement brought in the case of a Hungarian applicant. In this short article we summarize the facts of the case and the findings of the Court.Read more »
LAWFUL TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT IN HUNGARY – PART ONE: HOW TO JUSTIFY A DISMISSAL?
From salary to vacation leave, an employment relationship can have many sensitive parts. However, labour disputes mostly arise around the termination of the employment by the employer and specifically in connection with the justification of dismissal. Since the fault of the justification will result in unlawful termination, leading to important pecuniary consequences, in our forthcoming article series, we summarise the rules governing employment terminations and the related case-law of the Hungarian courts. In the first part we present the general rules for justifying employee termination.Read more »