Blog » HOW TO SIGN COMPANY DOCUMENTS IN HUNGARY
HOW TO SIGN COMPANY DOCUMENTS IN HUNGARY
15 May 2017
Doing business also means a lot of paper work. When signing company document in Hungary, it is important that the signature should not have any fault, because it may result in an invalid document, and can cause a loss of time and money. To avoid wasting time and money for administrative mistakes, read the must-knows we gathered in this article.
The person entitled to sign
All companies have authorized representatives, entitled to sign, ie. having signing authority. It means that this person is allowed to undertake obligation in the name of the company.
The person having signing authority may have several names: company manager, managing director, management board member, general director, generally called CEO.
But one thing is common: he must be registered in the company registry. So before starting to sign in the name of the company, check if you are registered or at least the registration procedure has been started.
When the representative is not available
There may be times when you are not available, and you want somebody to substitute you in company matters. When doing so, a power of attorney in a written form is essential, in which you, as the person having signing authority, give power and mandate to a colleague or to somebody else (eg. accountant, lawyer) to act as representative of the company.
It may seem easy that having a paper signed by the CEO can solve the problem, however, please keep in mind that the power of attorney shall be case-specific. It means that you have to indicate the case in which you mandate somebody to act on behalf of the company.
A general power of attorney, giving power of representation in non-specified matters is not be acceptable, because it runs counter to the principles of Hungarian company law.
The form of signature
Under Hungarian law, signing on behalf of the company is only valid if both the signature and the company name are on the same page of document next to each other. You must sign above, under or next to the name of the company, and the signature must be the same as described on the specimen of signature of the company.
Using a “company stamp” is not a must, but if the document does not bear the company name pre-printed on it, it may be useful so that you don’t have to spend time with writing the company name on every page.
If signing on behalf of a company, you don’t need witnesses, a mere signature with the company name has the same legal force like a private document signed by two witnesses.
Last, but not least, please remember to always sign with a blue pen. Pencil is not accepted, and black pen is hard to tell apart from a copy, so even if not being invalid, it can cause problems in front of authorities.
Using document signed outside of Hungary
If you sign a document abroad, and you want to use it before Hungarian authorities, you may have to request Apostille or authentication on it depending on the country where you are.
There are some countries where you don’t need to request neither apostille nor authentication from the consul, but an authentication of the local notary public is also acceptable. These countries are: Albania, Algeria, Austria, Belarus, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Greece, Italy, North-Korea, Macedonia, Mongolia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey, Vietnam.
Documents without any authentication can be used in a very limited cases, so it is worth to request it so that you don’t need to worry in the future.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »