Blog » HUNGARIAN TAX ON FOREIGN MOTOR VEICHLES TO BREACH EU LAW
HUNGARIAN TAX ON FOREIGN MOTOR VEICHLES TO BREACH EU LAW
30 November 2017
Just 10 years ago, the Hungarian registration tax case was brought before the European Court of Justice, where the national tax on second-hand cars imported from abroad has failed in Luxembourg. Hungary has no luck with taxes on foreign cars because in its recent judgement the EU Court has found that the Hungarian car tax also breaches EU law. The judgment will make happy rather international forwarding companies than Hungarian motorists, because the decision only applies to vehicles registered abroad, and passing through Hungary.
The background of the case
Istanbul Lojistik is a Turkish company which carries goods by road from Turkey to the EU. One of the company's lorries transported textile goods from Turkey to Germany in March 2015, but after a road check, the Hungarian tax authority found that the car tax was not paid in respect of this lorry.
For this reason, the Hungarian tax authority obliged the Turkish company to pay the car tax and imposed a penalty, amounting to ten times the amount of car tax.
The Turkish company brought an action for review of the administrative decision in front of the Hungarian court on the grounds, that the provisions of the Law on Motor Vehicles Tax infringed the EU-Turkey Association Agreement. In the latter Agreement, the contracting Parties - the European Economic Community and Turkey - established a customs union.
According to the company’s point of view, the tax imposed on motor vehicles registered in third countries which pass through Hungary as a transit state constitutes a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty and therefore constitutes a restriction on the free movement of goods contrary to European Union law.
The Hungarian court suspended the procedure and asked the European Court of Justice for a preliminary decision on interpretation of EU law.
The ECJ - in accordance with its well settled case law - stated that, whatever its designation, mode of application or amount, any pecuniary charge which is imposed unilaterally on goods that cross a border and which is not a customs duty in the strict sense, constitutes a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty.
In view of the fact that the parties agreed on a customs union in the EEC-Turkey Association Agreement, it is forbidden to levy customs or charges having equivalent effect.
However, the Hungarian law on motor vehicles tax treats differently the vehicles registered in Hungary and vehicles registered in Turkey, and the latter have to pay the tax at each entry to Hungary, which significantly undermines the competitiveness of Turkish carriers and is therefore contrary to the objectives of the Association Agreement.
Based on the above, the European Court of Justice stated in its judgement on the 19th October 2017 that the Hungarian motor vehicle tax constitutes a charge having equivalent effect to a customs duty and as such it is against the EU law.
Another interesting update in relation to the case is that according to an article published by a Turkish newspaper, nearly 100 Turkish lorries are stuck at the Hungarian border after the decision, so apparently the judgement of the European Court of Justice reached the Hungarian authorities unexpectedly.
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART II. TERMIANTION BASED ON BEHAVIOUR
Although, considering the current labour market in Hungary, employers are trying to keep the employees at the company, there may be situations where the employment relation cannot be maintained due to behaviour or attitude. In our previous article we explained that a dismissal by the employer is far from a simple move, as the legitimate justification must meet a number of criteria. In the present article, we examine the grounds for termination based on the behaviour of the employee.Read more »
CAN YOU FIRE YOUR EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF A BLOGPOST IN HUNGARY ? – STRASBOURG RULED
How to balance between the employer’s business interests and the employee’s right to freedom of expression? Can the employer restrict the employee’s freedom of expression and terminate his employment because of a blogpost? The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) addressed these questions in his fresh judgement brought in the case of a Hungarian applicant. In this short article we summarize the facts of the case and the findings of the Court.Read more »
LAWFUL TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT IN HUNGARY – PART ONE: HOW TO JUSTIFY A DISMISSAL?
From salary to vacation leave, an employment relationship can have many sensitive parts. However, labour disputes mostly arise around the termination of the employment by the employer and specifically in connection with the justification of dismissal. Since the fault of the justification will result in unlawful termination, leading to important pecuniary consequences, in our forthcoming article series, we summarise the rules governing employment terminations and the related case-law of the Hungarian courts. In the first part we present the general rules for justifying employee termination.Read more »