Blog » BACK TO COURTROOM? NEW RULES IN CIVIL LITIGATION FROM 1ST JUNE 2020
BACK TO COURTROOM? NEW RULES IN CIVIL LITIGATION FROM 1ST JUNE 2020
03 June 2020
In the emergency situation due to COVID-19 the rules of the civil litigation were modified: the most important change was that courts did not held court hearings at all or only through electronic telecommunication channels. Because of the moderation of the epidemic, from 1st June 2020 the civil litigations can return to “normality” with a few slight changes. In our short article we summarize the new rules.
1. Will there be „courtroom hearings” again?
The biggest change in comparison with the rules effective from 31 March 2020 is that as a main rule court can hold court hearings in the „traditional” way, in the building of the courtroom with the presence of the parties.
In case the court has set an “electronical” court hearing for a date after 1st June 2020, based on the rules of the emergency situation, then the court will inform the parties about the venue of the hearing and will hold it in the court building.
However, if pandemic instructions justify, courts can still hold hearings through electronic telecommunication channels. For example, if the party whose presence would be necessary on the hearing, is under quarantine, the court will hold the hearing electronically.
Moreover, the court may exclude the public from the hearing if this is necessary in order to ensure epidemic instructions (e.g. social distancing).
2. What happens in the cases where the court proceeded based on the transitional rules?
Specific rules apply to those cases where the court proceeded based on the “emergency situation” rules effective from 31 March 2020.
If the parties have filed all statements in the case initiation stage in writing, then the court warns the parties, clauses the case initiation stage and sets the merit hearing. Nevertheless, if the parties have not filed all statements, then the court sets a case initiation hearing.
If the court warned the parties that he is in the position to decide the case and the parties have filed their submissions or the deadline elapsed without it, the court delivers the judgement without a court hearing.
3. How remedy procedures will work?
From 31 March 2020 the parties could not request the court to hold a hearing in their appeal or judicial review procedure.
In case the court informed the parties until 1st June 2020 that he will decide the case without a hearing, then the court will deliver the judgement in writing. However, if the parties mutually request a hearing then the court sets the appeal or judicial review hearing.
From 1st June 2020 in accordance with the “ordinary” rules, the parties can request the court to hold a hearing in their motion for appeal or judicial review.
Slowly the civil litigation procedures can go back to “normal”, but the new transitional rules provide the possibility to the courts to react to the epidemic related measures (e.g. quarantine or to ensure social distancing).
Hungary: Steps Towards Differentiating Between Domestic and International Procedural Public Policy
Drawing a well-defined line of demarcation between domestic and international public policy when enforcing foreign arbitral awards sends a clear pro-arbitration message from national courts in any jurisdiction. Does Hungarian case law come close to this level of sophistication? This post analyses this question in the context of procedural public policy, and it does so based on two recent appellate court decisions rendered in the context of enforcement of arbitral awards in accordance with the New York Convention.Read more »
EU ISSUED NEW GDPR STANDARD CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES – WHEN AND HOW TO USE THEM?
During summer 2021, the European Commission published two new "standard contractual clauses" on data protection regulation, which can be applied on the one hand, to the legal relationship between data controllers and data processors covered by the GDPR , and to the transfers of personal data to third countries, on the other. In this article, we answer the questions: what these SCCs regulate, how do they differ from the previous SCCs and how can your company use the new SCCs?Read more »
CAN THE NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT BE VALID WITHOUT A PRECISE COMPENSATION IN HUNGARY?
The non-compete agreement may provide protection of the legitimate economic interests of the employer even after the termination of employment relationship. However, the Hungarian Labour Code lays down strict requirements for the agreement. In our article we analyse a recent decision of the Supreme Court about the importance of the precise determination of the compensation, so you as an employer can conclude a valid non-compete agreement.Read more »