Blog » CAN YOU SUE FACEBOOK IN YOUR HOME COUNTRY?
CAN YOU SUE FACEBOOK IN YOUR HOME COUNTRY?
12 February 2018
This was the basic question in a lawsuit in Austria filed by a private person against the social media giant. In this short article we explain the decision of the European Court which was published these days.
Maximilian Schrems, an Austrian privacy activist sued Facebook Ireland (“Facebook”) in Austria claiming that Facebook has breached dozens of data protection rules in relation with his own and other private persons private Facebook account. The other private persons assigned to Schrems their claims relating to those private accounts.
Facebook who has its registered seat in Ireland disputed the jurisdiction of the Austrian court. Facebook claimed that Mr. Schrems cannot rely on jurisdiction rule which allows consumers to bring claims in their home EU-country against the other party. The reason for that is that on the one hand, Mr. Schrems is using the Facebook for professional activities as he informs the public about his steps against the Facebook. On the other hand, Mr. Schrems has filed a class-action lawsuit and in Facebook’s opinion the favourable jurisdiction rule cannot be applied if one is willing to enforce assigned claims.
Before the Austrian court could jump into the details of the case he had to seek guidance of the European Court. The question was how the jurisdiction rule shall be interpreted that a consumer may bring proceedings against his contractual party in the courts of his home country if the contract was concluded for a purpose outside his profession.
2. Decision of the Court
First, the Court examined whether the fact that Mr. Schrems is informing the public about his lawsuits against the Facebook or advertises his books on the Facebook excludes him from being a consumer. The Court took into account that Mr. Schrems has a private Facebook account and also a Facebook page where the advertising activity is carried out.
The Court established that the mere fact that a private person publishes books and operates websites does not mean that his Facebook account cannot be considered as private and does not deprive him from his consumer status.
Second, the Court examined whether the specific jurisdiction rule can be applied in the case of assigned claims.
It was the view of the Court that the favourable jurisdiction rule was designed for consumer protection reasons. This kind of protection is only justifiable if the consumer is personally participating in the lawsuit. Therefore, the favourable jurisdiction rule cannot be applied in a proceeding brought by a consumer for the purpose of asserting claims assigned by other consumers.
3. Lessons learnt
All in all, as a consumer you can sue Facebook in your home EU-country even if you carried out some kind of professional activity (eg. on a separate Facebook-page) but only if you enforce your claims personally.
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART VI: TERMINATION WITHOUT NOTICE
In the last two articles of our series on “lawful dismissal” we present the most severe sanction that can be applied to an employee, the immediate (formerly: extraordinary) termination. This measure is applied in serious incidents only, so many employers believe that they will not need to use the sanction. But, as we know, the devil does not sleep and it is in the details, so the employer needs to be prepared for this scenario as well to avoid further inconvenience.Read more »
5 CURRENT GDPR-FINES ACROSS EUROPE – LEARN FROM OTHERS’ MISTAKES
The supervisory authorities in Europe controlling compliance with the GDPR have not sat on their hands in the last couple of months. In this short article we collected five interesting cases from the recent past. The wide discretionary powers of the data protection authority is well illustrated by the fact that sometimes the GDPR fine was only EUR 2000, but in another case a company has been fined for EUR 11,5 Million! Continue reading if you would like to avoid the same or similar expensive errors.Read more »
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART V: PROTECTION AGAINST DISMISSAL
In the previous articles on the lawful dismissal, we discussed that, ranging from the employee’s behaviour to the employer’s reorganization, there can be many legitimate reasons for dismissal by the employer. However, irrespective of the legitimate reason, the employment relationship cannot be terminated if the employee is protected against dismissal by law (i.e. the Labour Code). From our article, you can learn about these protections.Read more »