Blog » HEADS UP! DATA PROTECTION OFFICER ON BOARD!
HEADS UP! DATA PROTECTION OFFICER ON BOARD!
15 January 2018
My Colleague Anita is dealing with data protection issues for a longer period of time and in December 2017 she has became a data protection officer. Now I am asking Anita about her experiences she has acquired during the course.
Viki: Why have you decided to take the DPO course?
Anita: Soon after the adoption of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) we have started to deal with this topic in the office. We have figured out the GDPR will have an impact on basically all on our corporate clients as if one has employees, it is 100 % that personal data will be processed.
Although we have already gained significant knowledge, our managing partner, Richard encouraged me to deepen it and acquire practical experiences. That is why I have decided to make the GDPR manager – Data Protection Officer course.
Viki: What is the difference between a data protection officer and a lawyer who is specialized on data protection law?
Anita: A data protection officer does not only need legal knowledge but also has to be able to understand all business processes at the company which require the processing of personal data, including information security matters.
As an example, as an attorney who deals with data protection issues I know about what the company needs to inform its employees or clients if he processes their personal data. As a DPO I have to understand and identify the “route” of the collected personal data throughout the company (whether data is transmitted, how long and where is it stored) and what are the security risks on that “route”.
Viki: Have you acquired rather theoretical or practical knowledge on the course?
Anita: Obviously, we had to know the theoretical basics, so we have thoroughly reviewed the GDPR. In fact, as a good advice we were told that if we would like to be DPOs, we should read the GDPR at least 20 times.
However, in the significant part of the course we have learned how to apply the GDPR based on practical examples. For instance, we identified who is who in a data processing activity with multiple actors (eg. if the customer orders a product from our company and it will be delivered by a haulier), how the current data processing activities need to be reviewed and how to make them GDPR-compatible or how the records of data processing activities shall be maintained.
Viki: Which client needs to have a DPO?
Anita: Organizations whose main activity is the regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects (like a security company who operates camera surveillance system) will definitely need to appoint a DPO. Similarly, those companies who are processing sensitive data (eg. health data) on a large scale, like health service providers shall have one.
Of course, based on his own consideration, a company can decide to appoint a DPO to ensure the highest possible level of data protection even if he is not obliged to do so.
During the GDPR-compliance project we are happy to help clients to think over whether is it necessary or worth to appoint a data protection officer.
Anita, thank you for answering my questions.
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART VI: TERMINATION WITHOUT NOTICE
In the last two articles of our series on “lawful dismissal” we present the most severe sanction that can be applied to an employee, the immediate (formerly: extraordinary) termination. This measure is applied in serious incidents only, so many employers believe that they will not need to use the sanction. But, as we know, the devil does not sleep and it is in the details, so the employer needs to be prepared for this scenario as well to avoid further inconvenience.Read more »
5 CURRENT GDPR-FINES ACROSS EUROPE – LEARN FROM OTHERS’ MISTAKES
The supervisory authorities in Europe controlling compliance with the GDPR have not sat on their hands in the last couple of months. In this short article we collected five interesting cases from the recent past. The wide discretionary powers of the data protection authority is well illustrated by the fact that sometimes the GDPR fine was only EUR 2000, but in another case a company has been fined for EUR 11,5 Million! Continue reading if you would like to avoid the same or similar expensive errors.Read more »
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART V: PROTECTION AGAINST DISMISSAL
In the previous articles on the lawful dismissal, we discussed that, ranging from the employee’s behaviour to the employer’s reorganization, there can be many legitimate reasons for dismissal by the employer. However, irrespective of the legitimate reason, the employment relationship cannot be terminated if the employee is protected against dismissal by law (i.e. the Labour Code). From our article, you can learn about these protections.Read more »