Blog » HOW CAN YOU LITIGATE IN HUNGARY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS?
HOW CAN YOU LITIGATE IN HUNGARY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS?
08 April 2020
The coronavirus and the state of emergency ordered by the Hungarian government to fight this epidemic affects every part of our life. Civil and business litigations are not exceptions either. In our short article we summarize what are the most relevant changes in the ongoing and envisaged court procedures in Hungary.
1. Shall the parties meet the deadlines?
The decree of the Hungarian Government entered into force on 31 March 2020 sets forth the derogations from the provisions on civil litigations during the state of emergency.
The most important provision is that, as a main rule, the state of emergency does not affect the deadlines applicable to the ongoing procedures and to the litigations started after the entry into force of the government decree. That means the parties shall continue to comply with the orders of the court in the deadlines set out by the court.
Nevertheless, the decree sets forth a grace period: in case the deadline set out by the court ceases during 14 March and 15 April 2020, the deadline will be automatically lengthened until 30th April.
2. Is it possible to start procedures, file submissions?
Since a couple of years, the companies and the parties represented by legal representative shall file their submissions electronically in Hungary. In this sense, the state of emergency does not hinder the claimant to start a litigation electronically or to file his submissions in an ongoing procedure.
Further, the courts shall, just like normally, review the submissions and take the necessary measures, for example call the opposing party to file motions.
Indeed, during the current situation there is a greater focus on the literacy: for example, the court does not convene preliminary hearings but orders the parties to file their submissions in writing.
3. Do the courts hold court hearings and deliver judgements?
In the present situation, obviously, the court does not hold hearings in the building of the court. Nevertheless, if it is possible, it holds hearings through electronic telecommunication channels. How this will work in the practice? Today nobody knows the answer, because aside some criminal procedures, these methods of communication were not tested in the past in civil and business litigations.
If the “electronical” hearing is not possible and the evidences necessary to decide the case cannot be collected in writing, the litigation “stops” and the deadlines do not continue to run.
If, in the contrary, the court is in the position to decide the case, it warns the parties in writing calling them to file their final submissions. After that the court delivers the judgement without a court hearing.
4. How remedy procedures work during the state of emergency?
During the state of emergency, the appeal and judicial review procedure continue, this means if the court delivers his judgement during the state of emergency, the party can file his appeal in accordance with the general rules with the below modification.
Generally, in the remedy procedures the parties may request the court to hold a court a hearing, where they can present their arguments orally. During the state of emergency, the parties do not have this possibility, further even if they requested this earlier, the court does not hold a hearing.
In cases where the parties requested the court to hold a hearing, based on the mutual request of the parties, the court will hold an “electronical hearing” and in case it its conditions are not met, similarly to the first instance procedure, the procedure “stops” and the deadline do not continue to run.
5. And what is the case with the other procedures?
Besides litigation, the party may assert its civil and commercial claim by starting a payment warrant procedure or liquidation procedure.
In these cases, the personal presence has limited relevance, thus the state of emergency essentially does not hinder the parties to initiate or continue these procedures.
ONLINE SALE OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS WITHOUT BORDERS? LUXEMBURG RULED
Cross-border online sale of medicinal products is a recurring issue before the Court of Justice of the European Union. This is no coincidence, as trade in medicines is a strictly regulated area in all Member States, which can easily conflict with the EU principle of freedom to provide services, and in the end, the "price" of excessive national restrictions is borne by the consumers. In our article, we summarize the recent ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the limitation of the principle.Read more »
HOW REPORTING OF EMPLOYEE-TRAININGS HAS CHANGED FROM SEPTEMBER 2020 IN HUNGARY?
From September 2020 the rules, which regulate the status of the adult educators and the organisation of adult educations have changed. There are significantly more educations, which are considered as adult education and performing an adult education entails a lot more obligation. The changes affect almost every employer who organises certain kind of educations for its employees. We summarize the most important changes concerning the adult education.Read more »
LUXEMBOURG RULED: MESSI DRIBBLED PAST EVEN THE EUROPEAN TRADEMARK OFFICE
Messi hit the legal news again, this time not because of his tax issues. In September, the match between the EUIPO and the world-famous football player, which was ongoing since 2011, finally ended. Messi won the match, as the European Court of Justice ruled that because of his significant reputation, his name can be registered as a trademark despite the fact that it is similar to several earlier trademarks, which is otherwise a ground for exclusion. In our short article, we summarise the details of the case and the legal significance of the decision.Read more »