Blog » HOW TO CLAIM FLIGHT-DELAY COMPENSATION?
HOW TO CLAIM FLIGHT-DELAY COMPENSATION?
28 September 2017
My colleague, Viktória achieved great success in claiming compensation for air travelers whose flight was cancelled or delayed. As a frequent air passenger, it is worth to now your rights in relation with these unpleasant experiences. I am asking Viktória how and under what conditions you can get compensated.
Q (Anita): Viki, last week when we had our morning coffee in the kitchen, you mentioned that you just collected ca. 7000 Euros for air travelers. What happened with them? I mean in what cases can you get remedy from the airline?
A (Viki): There is a regulation (261/2004/EC) that can be applied in the whole European Union directly. This regulation says that the airlines must pay compensation to passengers in specific cases. The most frequent case granting compensation is the cancellation and delay. The delay has to be more than 3 hours to be entitled to compensation. The third case – that happens the least – when the passenger keeps all the rules and appears at the boarding, yet, the airline doesn’t let him to do so. This is the typical case of overbooking.
Q (Anita): Are there cases when the airline can be exempted from the compensation?
A (Viki): The rules are usually more favourable for the passengers, however, there are so called extraordinary circumstances, when the delay or the cancellation is not the airline’s fault. It is almost impossible to define what should be considered as extraordinary circumstances, because it depends on the specific case: for example, while snow falling in Moscow in the middle of January is absolutely normal, the same happening in Dubai is quite extraordinary. The traffic control and the staff cannot be expected to be prepared for such situation.
The biggest issue is always the technical problem. The European Court of Justice has already declared and explained several times that the airline is responsible for its vehicles, and the technical problems are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances.
Q (Anita): Let’s talk about the money. How much can you claim?
A (Viki): Depending on the distance there is a zone system for the compensation. In the European Union, there are two categories: below 1500 km the compensation is 250 EUR per person, and if the distance is more, you can request 400 EUR per person. If you travel to or from outside the EU, and the way is longer than 3500 km, it is possible to claim 600 EUR per person.
It is important that if you have to transfer flights, the distance must be counted until the very last destination. This means if you travel to China from Hungary via France, and you miss your connection because of the delay of the first flight, resulting in 10 hours’ late in China, then you can request 600 EUR compensation.
Q (Anita): How can you get the compensation? Do you have to sue the airline?
A (Viki): It may be the best to contact them first. Most airlines have a separate online surface for the EU compensations. In all cases it should be examined if the passenger’s claim is reasonable. Sadly, the usual process is that the airline tries to get rid of the passenger with the phrase there was an extraordinary circumstance, thus they don’t have to give compensation. They also refer to the regulation’s articles to look more authentic. However, they rarely give further explanation. In most cases if the passengers see such a reasoning, looking very official, very legal, they just don’t fight back and eventually, they give up.
Instead of withdrawal, it is worth to give it a further try, if the passenger doesn’t know about any circumstance (unusually heavy storm, volcanic eruption, terror attack, etc.) that may look like extraordinary. Trying harder is worth because even if the airline says there was an extraordinary circumstance, the airline must prove that there was such a circumstance and it must be considered extraordinary in the current situation. In this phase it is advised to ask for some help from a lawyer.
Q (Anita): Based on your experiences, are airlines cooperative?
A (Viki): I have both positive and negative experience, but the sad fact is that most airlines are very stubborn, and play the tactic of making the passenger get tired of the whole process. Unfortunately, this trick usually works. After 1-2 official letters, the passengers just get tired of chasing their money.
The airlines tend to become cooperative usually after starting a legal process against them. Because this is the first time that the airline’s lawyer checks the case, and admits that they will lose, and it is cheaper to pay as soon as possible.
Q (Anita): Can you tell me the most interesting case in your practice?
A (Viki): Among our own cases the most interesting is usually the excuses that airlines make to justify the delay with „extraordinary circumstances”: for example, fog on a November morning, or one of the passengers becoming sick, etc. Unfortunately, in our newest cases they don’t even make the effort to make up excuses, just declare there was an extraordinary circumstance.
The most interesting case that I’ve ever seen is from the practice of the European Court of Justice: the Henning case, where they were analysing the exact time when the delay ends. In this case, the airplane landed with 2 hours 58 minutes’ delay, parked to its place with 3 hours 3 minutes’ delay, and opened the doors afterwards. The Court made the conclusion that there is a delay until the doors of the plane are closed, because the passengers are “captured” by the airline, that limits their personal liberty, and causes damage to them.
Viki, thank you for sharing with us your thoughts. I hope I will never stuck at the airport but in case I do, I know whom I should turn to.
CAN THE CHOICE OF COURT AMOUNT TO THE CHOICE OF LAW? – THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED
Shall it be considered as the choice of the English law if the party first starts a litigation in England regarding to a Hungarian project? How much of a role do the procedural acts of the parties play in relation to the choice of law applicable to a contract? In this article we analyse the fresh judgement of the Supreme Court, in which, among others, the highest court addressed the issue of the tacit choice of law.Read more »
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AT DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN HUNGARY – NEW LEGAL RELATIONSHIP?
What are the main risks if you employ your staff at different employer, within or outside the company group? Is that a new legal relationship, is remuneration payable for that, or the “good old” labour contract can cover this situation? In a recent judgement the Hungarian Supreme Court Curia addressed these questions. In our short article we analyse the judgement and summarize what you as an employer should consider if you would like to temporary reassign your employee.Read more »
OVERVIEW OF THE TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS TO HUNGARY FROM 1st SEPTEMBER 2020
Travel restrictions to Hungary (“Travel Restrictions”) can be regulated on unilateral, bilateral or multilateral level. So far, we have knowledge about one unilateral and three bilateral travel restrictions adopted by the Hungarian government, so this overview will be focused on these. However, given the fast-changing nature of the situation, it can be the case that more bilateral agreement will be adopted, that change the current legal environment.Read more »