Blog
Blog » HUNGARY: WHY HIRE A LAW FIRM TO COLLECT DEBT INSTEAD OF A COLLECTION AGENCY?
HUNGARY: WHY HIRE A LAW FIRM TO COLLECT DEBT INSTEAD OF A COLLECTION AGENCY?
14 March 2023
In the recent years of crisis, it's becoming more and more common that your business partners fail to pay your invoices. After getting bored of their excuses or silences, there comes a time when you have to put pressure on your debtor. At that point, you either hire a law firm or turn to one of the many debt collection agencies offering “simple and cheap, yet efficient” solutions. But are the latter solutions really that effective? Is it worth entrusting a debt collection agency in Hungary? In our article, we bring up three reasons why you should hire rather a law firm in Hungary instead of a collection agency.
1. Agencies cannot represent you in legal procedures
The main problem with such agencies is that they cannot represent you in legal procedures, so their service has minimal added value.
Basically, they can do the same as you: sending a notice letter. If we consider Hungarian legal procedures, you will need a legal representative in all cases. In liquidations, or high-value litigation, the legal representation is mandatory by law. In the rest of the cases, legal expertise and technical background is also needed, so in the end, the case will land on a lawyer’s desk. With this in mind, let’s jump to the next point.
2. Why would you need an unnecessary middleman?
As mentioned above, it is very likely that a debt collection agency will hand over your case to a lawyer after an unsuccessful notice letter. If so, why would you insert a middleman who takes a cut from the fee without adding any value? Shouldn’t you rather invest the share of the agency in professional legal services?
Not to mention, that it is much more favourable for you if you can communicate with the same person throughout the procedure, who understands your case from the beginning.
3. Legal expertise throughout the process
If the recovery of the debt is important for you, why would you wait months until the agency hands over your case to a lawyer to start the legal work? In fact, your case should be assessed by a lawyer at the beginning, so you can make your decision based on the advice of a legal expert, not based on frivolous promises such as “our agency has 90% recovery rate”.
Finally, we would like to recall an instructive story from our experience: a person hired an agency to recover a debt. Although the agency managed to recover a part, but it came with a price: the agency concluded an agreement containing that “the creditor waives all future claims and considers the accounts settled”.
When the person later started litigation against the debtor on the same grounds, unluckily for him, his claim was dismissed because of the unfavourable agreement the collection agency concluded on his behalf. We don't think any law firm would waive your rights just to close the case as soon as possible.
In conclusion, you should carefully consider choosing a collection agency, because once legal work is needed, the case will be taken over by a lawyer anyway. If so, we think it is better investing the agency’s fee in professional services from the beginning and having your case handled by a legal expert during the entire process.
-
WHAT ARE THE COSTS OF THE LITIGATION IN HUNGARY?
When it comes to litigating in Hungary, foreign parties often only take into account the court duties and attorney's fees as costs. However, in addition to these, there may be additional expenses that may come as a surprise. In order to avoid this, in our short article, we will summarise the costs of litigating in Hungary.
Read more » -
FROM CONFIDENTIALITY TO TRANSPARENCY IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION? HCAC – JUS MUNDI – HAA JOINT CONFERENCE IN BUDAPEST
Celebrating their partnership agreement signed last year, the Permanent Arbitration Court attached to the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (HCAC) and Jus Mundi organized a half-day conference together with the Hungarian Arbitration Association in Budapest, on 4 May 2023, with the title ‘Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration’. This blog post sheds light on the background and summarises the main topics of the conference.
Read more » -
CJEU RULING ON REST PERIODS - HUNGARIAN LABOUR LAW TO BE AMENDED
In its recent judgment of 2 March 2023, the CJEU ruled on the concepts of daily and weekly rest period and their relation. The judgment fundamentally contradicts the approach reinforced in the Hungarian Labour Code this year; therefore the legislator has to change the concept of rest periods to comply with the EU Working Time Directive.
Read more »