Blog » ILF CONFERENCE IN MILAN – PRESENTATION - TAKEAWAYS FROM FIRST GDPR PENALTIES
ILF CONFERENCE IN MILAN – PRESENTATION - TAKEAWAYS FROM FIRST GDPR PENALTIES
15 May 2019
This May we participated in the European Conference of International Law Firms in Milan, where our managing partner Richard Schmidt held a presentation to members of ILF on recent developments of European Data Protection Law. The presentation focused on the lessons learnt from the first GDPR fines imposed by the national data protection authorities of various European jurisdictions in the 1st year of GDPR.
Our office is member of International Law Firms (ILF), a network of 70+ medium-sized independent law firms around the world. The members of ILF gather each year to hold conference on worldwide and regional level, in order to exchange experience, share knowledge and deepen interpersonal relations between lawyers.
This year the European regional conference was held between 10-11 May 2019 in Milan, which is not only the capital of fashion, but the business centre of Italy, as well. The conference was hosted by our esteemed member, Italy, Avv. Veronica Donella, partner of Studio Legale Donella. The popularity of the conference is shown by the fact that delegates of more than 25 law firms participated the event, even from non-European countries, like USA, China (Hong Kong) and Indonesia.
Our law firm was represented by managing partner Richard Schmidt, who held a presentation to the members of ILF on the recent developments of European data protection law.
Given that the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) celebrates soon its 1st birthday, Richard’s presentation was focusing on the application of GDPR in the EU member states, in order to address the issue, whether there is a divergence or convergence between the national data protection authorities of the European countries.
Richard started the presentation with the sanction system of the GDPR, by shortly summarizing the non-pecuniary and pecuniary sanctions of the regulation.
Then Richard analysed the application of the sanctions through case studies brought from different European jurisdictions. Starting with the famous Google decision from France, he continued with the Portuguese hospital case, and with the case of Bisnode in Poland. The case study section of the presentation was closed with taxi company case from Denmark, and with the “Rousseau Platform” case from Italy.
As a synthesis, Richard analysed, how the various aggravating and mitigating factors influencing the severity of sanctions applied work in practice, in the light of the above mentioned national decisions, by emphasizing that the vast majority of open issues will be solved only years later, when the European Court of Justice will deliver judgment in the framework of preliminary ruling procedures, interpreting the disputed provisions of the GDPR.
The presentation was closed by a questions and answers section, in the framework of which interesting questions were discussed by the participants, like extra-EU enforcement of GDPR fines, legitimate interest tests in practice, etc.
We would like to express our highest level of gratitude and appreciation for the organisers to host such a great regional conference in Milan!
CAN YOUR DEBTOR ESCAPE LIQUIDATION BY SETTING OFF CLAIMS IN HUNGARY?
The initiation of a liquidation procedure is an effective debt collection method, since the debtor may only avoid being liquidated by paying the claim if the conditions specified in the Act on Bankruptcy Proceedings and Liquidation (Bankruptcy Act) are met. For this reason, in the case of liquidation, one of the most common defences of the debtor is the reference to offsetting. But can the debtor refer to offsetting without limitation during liquidation? In our short article we answer this question.Read more »
SZIGET FESTIVAL FINED RECORD HUF 30 MILLION FOR GDPR BREACHES – WHAT WENT WRONG?
A few days prior to the first anniversary of the entry into force of the GDPR the Hungarian Data Protection Authority imposed the biggest data protection fine in Hungary so far. The target was the biggest Hungarian festival organizer company thanks to whom the public may enjoy the SZIGET, the VOLT or the Balaton Sound Festival. The Data Protection Authority reviewed the check-in system of the festival and the data processing in relation with the check-in. In our short article we summarize the mistakes the Authority identified.Read more »
CONSTRUCTION TRUSTEESHIP IN HUNGARY - GETTING PAID IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS SUBCONTRACTOR
Construction trusteeship, as mandatory collateral management of major private construction projects in Hungary, strives for protecting subcontractors against non-paying general contractor, by allowing direct payments from employer under certain conditions. How does it work in practice and what are the limits of subcontractor protection? We address these issues in this article.Read more »