Blog » ILF CONFERENCE IN MILAN – PRESENTATION - TAKEAWAYS FROM FIRST GDPR PENALTIES
ILF CONFERENCE IN MILAN – PRESENTATION - TAKEAWAYS FROM FIRST GDPR PENALTIES
15 May 2019
This May we participated in the European Conference of International Law Firms in Milan, where our managing partner Richard Schmidt held a presentation to members of ILF on recent developments of European Data Protection Law. The presentation focused on the lessons learnt from the first GDPR fines imposed by the national data protection authorities of various European jurisdictions in the 1st year of GDPR.
Our office is member of International Law Firms (ILF), a network of 70+ medium-sized independent law firms around the world. The members of ILF gather each year to hold conference on worldwide and regional level, in order to exchange experience, share knowledge and deepen interpersonal relations between lawyers.
This year the European regional conference was held between 10-11 May 2019 in Milan, which is not only the capital of fashion, but the business centre of Italy, as well. The conference was hosted by our esteemed member, Italy, Avv. Veronica Donella, partner of Studio Legale Donella. The popularity of the conference is shown by the fact that delegates of more than 25 law firms participated the event, even from non-European countries, like USA, China (Hong Kong) and Indonesia.
Our law firm was represented by managing partner Richard Schmidt, who held a presentation to the members of ILF on the recent developments of European data protection law.
Given that the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) celebrates soon its 1st birthday, Richard’s presentation was focusing on the application of GDPR in the EU member states, in order to address the issue, whether there is a divergence or convergence between the national data protection authorities of the European countries.
Richard started the presentation with the sanction system of the GDPR, by shortly summarizing the non-pecuniary and pecuniary sanctions of the regulation.
Then Richard analysed the application of the sanctions through case studies brought from different European jurisdictions. Starting with the famous Google decision from France, he continued with the Portuguese hospital case, and with the case of Bisnode in Poland. The case study section of the presentation was closed with taxi company case from Denmark, and with the “Rousseau Platform” case from Italy.
As a synthesis, Richard analysed, how the various aggravating and mitigating factors influencing the severity of sanctions applied work in practice, in the light of the above mentioned national decisions, by emphasizing that the vast majority of open issues will be solved only years later, when the European Court of Justice will deliver judgment in the framework of preliminary ruling procedures, interpreting the disputed provisions of the GDPR.
The presentation was closed by a questions and answers section, in the framework of which interesting questions were discussed by the participants, like extra-EU enforcement of GDPR fines, legitimate interest tests in practice, etc.
We would like to express our highest level of gratitude and appreciation for the organisers to host such a great regional conference in Milan!
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »
CAN YOU REQUEST ‘COVID-19 VACCINATED’ CERTIFICATION FROM YOUR EMPLOYEE IN HUNGARY?
In the recent weeks, a number of questions have been arisen whether the employer may know the data contained by the „immunity card”, which aim is to certify immunity to coronavirus. Is the employer entitled to request information from the employee regarding the immunity card or store the information concerning its employee? In this article we answer the above questions on the basis of the information („Information”) of Hungarian National Authority for Data Protection and Freedom of Information.Read more »
DO YOU HAVE TO TERMINATE THE REPLACEMENT EMPLOYEES’ CONTRACT IN HUNGARY?
In the event of a longer leave of a worker, it is common for employers to hire a replacement worker with fixed term contract to make up for the missing workforce. When the replaced worker returns, a labour dispute may arise. In the legal case presented in our article, the Supreme Court examined how the employment relationship of the replacement employee terminates at the end of the replacement. From our article you can learn about the decision of the Supreme Court and what to look for as an employer to make the closing of the replacement smooth. (In our article, we examine the court decision published under No. BH 2021.2.51)Read more »