Blog » NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY - 5 GOLDEN RULES FOR EMPLOYERS
NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY - 5 GOLDEN RULES FOR EMPLOYERS
02 October 2019
Employers often use non-compete agreement in Hungary, but labour courts frequently declare them invalid. Can a training course serve as compensation of the agreement? Or what to do, if it turns out after years, that the leaving colleague does not mean a real and serious threat for your company? In its opinion published recently, the Hungarian Supreme Court gave a guidance on non-compete agreements, which we summarise in this article.
1. Definition of competitor
In a non-compete agreement, you should lay down who are the competitors, or which are the activities your employee should avoid after the termination of his employment.
If you want to prevent that your employee is hired by your biggest rivals in the market, it is also worth checking their activity registered in the commercial register, as it does not cover the real activity in case of many companies.
According to the judicial practice, there is a presumption, that the competitor carries the activity in registered in the commercial register, and it is the employer’s burden to rebut this. So, it is worth considering the related costs in advance, and carefully draft the non-competition clause.
2. Limits of the prohibition
After the termination of the employment relationship, you should not restrict unjustly and excessively the gainful activity of your previous employee in terms of time and geographic area l.
For instance, you can’t prohibit generally to carry out a certain activity on a “worldwide level”, but a restriction for a country or a bigger region within that may be less likely invalid.
When it comes to duration, the non-compete agreement can be valid for 2 (two) years maximum from the termination of the employment.
3. Appropriate compensation
The central element of the non-compete agreement is the “appropriate compensation”.
Firstly, it is worth bearing in mind, that the compensation can be only money, therefore payment in kind, for instance taking a programme course is not an appropriate compensation according to the case-law.
You can pay the financial consideration monthly or you can pay up front the entire amount, but the sum of it for the whole non-compete agreement cannot be less than one third of the basic salary for the same period.
In addition, the compensation should be proportional. Consequently, a two-year agreement for one third of the base salary with a worldwide scope will be less likely proportionate and therefore valid. At the same time, a one-year restriction for half of the base salary with a scope of one country or a region within that will be presumably appropriate.
4. Changed circumstances
Sometimes more years pass between the conclusion of the agreement and the departure of the employee.
Thus, it can happen that the colleague, with whom you concluded a non-compete agreement by reason of “high-risk”, after years, due to market situation or technological change, does not mean real and serious threat for your company.
Unfortunately, the changed circumstances are irrelevant in relation to non-compete agreement.
Therefore you, as an employer, are obliged to pay the money laid down in the agreement even if it turns out later, that due to his abilities or for other reasons he cannot violate or threaten your economic interest.
5. The solution: right of withdrawal
In order to avoid the above situation, it is worth stipulating the right of withdrawal in the non-competition agreement at the beginning, which allows you to unilaterally terminate the agreement when the employee leaves your company.
By stipulating the right of withdrawal, you can make the non-competition agreement more flexible and cost-effective, because you maintain the opportunity to terminate it later unilaterally.
Any restrictions against leaving employees can be enforced on the basis of a valid non-compete agreement, therefore it is important to consider the above opinion of the Curia. In addition, it is worth turning to a lawyer, specialised in labour and business law, who can draft a non-compete agreement, custom-tailored to your company.
CAN YOUR DEBTOR BE PUT IN PRISON FOR HIS DEBT IN HUNGARY?
You can hear a lot of stories where the debtor “escaped with the money”, the construction contractor “disappeared” or the debtor company’s assets have been hidden. Essentially, failure to pay is a breach of contract, which is subject to civil action, eg. litigation. However, if a transaction is suspected to be a scam, criminal proceedings may be brought against the defaulting debtor, for example, for fraud, which we examine in this article.Read more »
EU COURT RULED - STRENGHTENED CONSUMER PROTECTION IN CROSS BORDER DEBT RECOVERY
Can the unfairness of cross-border claim be reviewed ex officio in case of consumer contracts in such a simplified procedure, like the European order for payment procedure? In our article, we analyse the recent judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Bondora case and its possible effects on cross-border debt recovery, covering also the Hungarian legal regulations.Read more »
LAWFUL DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY - PART IV: TERMIANTION BASED ON EMPLOYER’S OPERATIONS
In the previous articles on the lawful dismissal, we explained dismissal for employee-related reasons. However, that is only half of the whole picture, because in many cases the employer dismisses employees for reasons of reorganization or redundancy. Justification must meet strict rules to be lawful in this case as well, the details of which we explore in this article based on case law of Hungarian labour courts.Read more »