Blog » SMART WAYS TO INCREASE EMPLOYEE WAGES IN HUNGARY
SMART WAYS TO INCREASE EMPLOYEE WAGES IN HUNGARY
29 May 2019
Remuneration is one of the cornerstones of an employment relationship for both parties. It is not a new practice that employers seek other ways to increase the consideration of workers without modifying the base wage. The so-called “semi-official” solutions can be dangerous for the employer, because an employment ending badly can easily be the beginning of a labour dispute. In our article, we will show you smart salary solutions compliant with the Hungarian labour law.
Base wage from the employer's perspective
As the name implies, the base wage is the starting point of the wage paid. It is a mandatory element of the employment contract and it must be paid in the form of money. For employers, however, raising the base wage may be unfavourable in many ways:
- May not be amended unilaterally
According to the Labour Code (LC.), the terms of the employment contract, so as the base wage, can only be modified bilaterally by mutual agreement. This can be a problem for the employer if they want to raise the employee's salary only temporarily (for example, for the performance of surplus tasks), as they cannot later unilaterally reset the previous wage.
- Wage supplements also increase
Another important role of the base wage that it serves as a basis for the calculation of most wage supplements, such as overtime, shift premium, night work, work on holidays. Furthermore, the absentee fee paid for the period of sick leave or holiday is also calculated considering the base wage. Hence, raising the base wage also increases the amount of wage supplement to be paid, so consider the above before announcing a nice-sounding raise.
What are the other options?
All other benefits (bonus, cafeteria, public transport pass) provided in addition to the base salary and wage supplements are considered as fringe benefits. Despite the fact that the LC. does not expressly regulate these, as an employer, you cannot apply benefits as you like.
In respect of the remuneration of work, the principle of equal treatment must be strictly considered. According to the LC., ‘wage’ shall mean any remuneration provided directly or indirectly in cash or in kind, based on the employment relationship.
Equal treatment does not mean that all employees shall be provided with the same benefits. For example, a distinction can be made between employees in different groups or departments. In contrast, you cannot treat workers differently based on their “protected characteristics”, thus it is unlawful if you announce a bonus program only for female employees, or surprise workers under the age of 30 with a Sziget Festival ticket.
Bonus and reward
Flexible wage development can be accomplished by setting bonus tasks. You can do it with publishing a prospectus, however, we suggest signing a mutual agreement with the employee. According to the judicial practice, you must pay attention to the following in order to have a compliant bonus system.
- Task must be defined and assessed objectively
As we mentioned above, you will not find the regulation of “bonus” in the legislation, so it is particularly important that you define the rules of your bonus system in detail and clear, to prevent misunderstandings. The criteria must be related to the employment relationship and objectively measurable.
Therefore, bonus condition can even be for the employee to be present during most working days. On the contrary, the general formulation of the task, like "good work" or "achievement of expected performance" is inadequate. In such cases, the assessment become subjective on the part of the employer, which violates the rights of the employee.
- employee's right to the bonus
Judicial practice also protects the employee from being deprived of the possibility to achieve bonus. In this regard, the employer may not withdraw from the announced bonus program if the performance of the tasks has already started.
A bonus scheme or reward that has been applied regularly in previous years (thus became a practice) may not be cancelled without a legitimate reason. In addition, the employee may also claim the bonus if the goal could not be met due to external reasons.
It is also possible for the employer to pay a bonus advance during the year, so an instalment can be added to the monthly wage. If the bonus requirements are not met, the advance can be reclaimed.
Based on our article you can see the practical benefits of wage increase with fringe benefits and the uncertainties related to the system. A well-constructed and applied reward system can be an effective wage development tool as well. In order to protect the interests of both parties, we recommend the involvement of legal experts in the process.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »