Blog
Blog » THE CASE OF WAIT UNTIL ITS LATE LTD. V. FRANK FINK
THE CASE OF WAIT UNTIL ITS LATE LTD. V. FRANK FINK
27 March 2017
Learn from others' mistake by reading the summary of a very fresh decision of the Supreme Court about an ordinary dismissal.
Story
Wait Until Its Late Ltd. terminated the employment of its financial planning and analytical leader, Frank Fink. The reason of the termination was the loss of trust: Wait Until Its Late Ltd. conducted an examination and found out that Frank Fink unauthorizedly ordered overtime work and approved certain payments to his supervisor. Because of these infringements, Wait Until Its Late Ltd. lost his trust in Frank.
Although the examination was closed in May, Wait Until Its Late Ltd. could only fire Frank in October since his position was very important and Wait Until Its Late Ltd. had to find the new colleague for the job.
Court procedure
Frank Fink sued Wait Until Its Late Ltd. claiming that the justification of the termination is not valid and cannot be the reason of the termination. On the one hand, he disputed that he committed the said infringements. On the other hand, he claimed that the alleged loss of the trust happened in May while Wait Until Its Late Ltd. only fired him ca. 5 months later which cannot be a timely justification.
The first & second instance court dismissed Frank’s claim and accepted Wait Until Its Late Ltd’s argumentation that although he lost the trust in Frank earlier, he needed to find the new colleague for the position and only after this he could fire Frank.
By contrast, the Supreme Court found the termination wrongful. The loss of trust happened in May when the examination was closed. The fact that Wait Until Its Late Ltd. continued to employ Frank for 5 months after the examination, undermines his argumentation that the reason of termination is the loss of trust. In case of loss of trust, the employer cannot wait for months with the termination. The important role of the employee and the fact that the position needed to be filled cannot be an excuse for the delay of Wait Until Its Late Ltd.
Lesson learnt
If you find a valid reason to fire your employee, do not delay with the termination. The reason which is a valid one at the time it occurs, cannot necessarily be applied at a later date.
-
CAN THE CHOICE OF COURT AMOUNT TO THE CHOICE OF LAW? – THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED
Shall it be considered as the choice of the English law if the party first starts a litigation in England regarding to a Hungarian project? How much of a role do the procedural acts of the parties play in relation to the choice of law applicable to a contract? In this article we analyse the fresh judgement of the Supreme Court, in which, among others, the highest court addressed the issue of the tacit choice of law.
Read more » -
TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AT DIFFERENT EMPLOYER IN HUNGARY – NEW LEGAL RELATIONSHIP?
What are the main risks if you employ your staff at different employer, within or outside the company group? Is that a new legal relationship, is remuneration payable for that, or the “good old” labour contract can cover this situation? In a recent judgement the Hungarian Supreme Court Curia addressed these questions. In our short article we analyse the judgement and summarize what you as an employer should consider if you would like to temporary reassign your employee.
Read more » -
OVERVIEW OF THE TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS TO HUNGARY FROM 1st SEPTEMBER 2020
Travel restrictions to Hungary (“Travel Restrictions”) can be regulated on unilateral, bilateral or multilateral level. So far, we have knowledge about one unilateral and three bilateral travel restrictions adopted by the Hungarian government, so this overview will be focused on these. However, given the fast-changing nature of the situation, it can be the case that more bilateral agreement will be adopted, that change the current legal environment.
Read more »