Blog » WHY SHOULD YOU INVOLVE A LAWYER IN YOUR GDPR PROJECT?
WHY SHOULD YOU INVOLVE A LAWYER IN YOUR GDPR PROJECT?
18 June 2018
In the last months preceding the entering into force of GDPR, the market was inundated with various service providers promising data protection compliance: data protection experts, counsels, IT experts, etc. Besides these providers, lawyers and law firms, experienced in the field of data protection also provide GDPR compliance services. We summarize the reason why you should involve them in your GDPR compliance project.
Law or informatics?
The General Data Protection Regulation of the EU is often called as common child of lawyers and IT professionals, because its rules are governing issues falling to the territory of the two above professions. So data protection experts are basically lawyers or IT professionals, who at a certain point of their carrier decided to specialize in the field of data protection, and IT security.
In order to decide, whether it is enough to hire an IT professional for GDPR compliance it is worth to consider, what kind of procedure starts if you breach the data protection rules, and in this procedure what role is played by lawyer and IT professionals.
To simplify the question: in case of a data breach, whether an IT procedure starts in which lawyers are taken into as experts, or a legal procedure starts in which IT professionals are taken into as experts.
The procedure of Data Protection Authority
The compliance with the GDPR is controlled by the data protection authority, who in case of infringement, starts a so-called administrative procedure, which is basically a legal procedure, carried out by lawyers.
In an administrative procedure basically two relevant questions can emerge
- question of law (for example the proper determination of the legal basis of data processing, or the person of data controller or data processor) which is decided by the lawyers of the data protection authority;
- IT related question (e.g. the appropriateness of IT security measures, etc.) which is decided by an IT Expert, appointed by the lawyer of the data protection authority.
In practice the most common mistake is the wrong determination of the role of the parties (who is data controller, who is data processor) and the wrong choice among the 6 (six) legal basis of the data processing (consent, or legitimate interest, etc.).
If these issues are wrongly addressed, your whole GDPR compliance project can be basically wrong, with serious consequences.
These above questions are clearly legal questions.
In addition to the above a lot of IT problem may arise, which are considered in the administrative procedure as IT questions belonging to expert’s competence. If such a question emerges, the IT expert appointed by the lawyer of the data protection authority prepares an expert report, and it will be incorporated into the final decision of the authority, made by the lawyer.
Remedy in front of court
In case you would like to challenge the decision of the data protection authority, you can do it in front of the Labour and Administrative court, by filing an administrative litigation against the data protection authority.
In administrative litigation, you must be represented by a lawyer, so you can start the court case only with a lawyer against the data protection authority, which must also be represented by a lawyer,
The judge making the decision in the litigation is also a lawyer, who, in case a relevant IT question arises, is entitled to take an IT professional into the litigation as expert.
Lawyers and IT Professionals
As can be seen, in case of a procedure started because of a breach of data protection laws, the main directions and general questions of the legal procedures are decided by lawyers, while IT professionals are needed in a well-defined specific field.
So in case of data breach, not lawyers are taken into an IT procedure, but IT professionals are taken as experts into a legal procedure.
Who should you entrust with your GDPR compliance project?
If you entrust a knowledgeable and experienced lawyer with the GDPR Compliance of your company, you can be sure that he will examine your company with the “same eyes” as the investigator of the data protection authority, or the judge, who supervises the decision of the data protection authority.
It is obvious, that a lawyer should decide, whether your company should be considered as data controller or data processor, because this will determine your basic obligations and responsibility.
The same goes for the choice between the legal basis of the processing of personal data, because this will determine the content of the notification of your client and employees.
After the two above questions have been properly addressed, there are certain issues, where the help of an IT professional is needed, and a n well-prepared data protection lawyer can smoothly cooperate with the IT expert.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »