Blog » HOW TO CLOSE YOUR LLC IN HUNGARY IN 3 STEPS?
HOW TO CLOSE YOUR LLC IN HUNGARY IN 3 STEPS?
17 May 2018
Businesses come, businesses go, and there are times when you reach a point when you decide it is better to finish your business in Hungary. Similar to creating a company, closing a company is also a legal procedure at the court of registration. You will need professional help in this issue: a lawyer and an accountant. Let’s see how it goes.
1. Deciding the winding up of the company
The first step is to decide that the company doesn’t wish to continue its activity anymore. If there are more shareholders in the company, this must be decided with the approval of at least the 3/4 of the votes in case of LLC or company limited by shares. If the form of the company is a limited partnership or general partnership, then the votes of all shareholders is necessary to start the winding up procedure. If there is only one member in a company, the situation is easy, because the single member can decide alone.
The decision has to cover the following issues:
- the beginning date of the winding up procedure
- mandating the receiver, who will replace the managing director (the receiver can be the same person as the managing director was)
- decision about the other entities in which the company has any role
After the decision is accepted by the court of registration, the company will be registered with a name suffix “under winding up procedure” (shortened as “v.a.” in Hungarian).
2. Winding up procedure
The declaration to start the procedure is followed by the procedure itself, that contains a lot of administrative and financial background work.
The first tasks of the receiver to contact the following entities and inform them that the company is under winding up procedure:
- land registry office
- any registry office that registered any assets of the company
- national labour market organization
- environment protection authority
- banks where the company has any accounts
- the managing directors of other companies, associations and foundations in which the company has shares
Then after the winding up procedure is announced in the company gazette, the creditors have 40 days to report their claims to the company. The receiver records such claims, and starts to make a balance sheet for opening winding up. If the situation is unfortunate, and the company’s sources do not cover its debts, the procedure will turn into a liquidation procedure.
When continuing the winding up procedure, the receiver’s task is to collect the claims of the company, pay all the debts and sell the properties of the company. Terminating the contracts being in effect is also belonging to his task list.
If the above mentioned are done, and there is no ongoing dispute or any procedure that would hinder the closing of the winding up procedure, the final step is to prepare the tax reports and closing balance of the company. The financial documents are usually prepared by an accountant.
3. Closing winding up
After the financial background of the company is settled, the last step is to report the end of the winding up procedure to the court of registration. This must happen in 3 years after the beginning of the procedure (we would like to mark that if there is no serious legal dispute, it should be finished usually in a year).
The company has to give the approval to the closing balance sheet, decide about the distribution of the remaining assets, mark a place where the company documents should be stored, and deciding to delete the company from the registry. Until this point the company can change its mind and continue the activity.
As the winding up procedure needs preparation and work, and it is a quite long procedure (can be finished usually in 1 year), we would suggest to think twice if you really wish to finish your business in Hungary. If you would like just to pause the activity, this might not be the best solution for you. Also, if there is somebody who would like to continue the business you have been doing, it might be also a good idea to sell your shares.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »