Blog » NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY - 5 GOLDEN RULES FOR EMPLOYERS
NON-COMPETE CLAUSES IN HUNGARY - 5 GOLDEN RULES FOR EMPLOYERS
02 October 2019
Employers often use non-compete agreement in Hungary, but labour courts frequently declare them invalid. Can a training course serve as compensation of the agreement? Or what to do, if it turns out after years, that the leaving colleague does not mean a real and serious threat for your company? In its opinion published recently, the Hungarian Supreme Court gave a guidance on non-compete agreements, which we summarise in this article.
1. Definition of competitor
In a non-compete agreement, you should lay down who are the competitors, or which are the activities your employee should avoid after the termination of his employment.
If you want to prevent that your employee is hired by your biggest rivals in the market, it is also worth checking their activity registered in the commercial register, as it does not cover the real activity in case of many companies.
According to the judicial practice, there is a presumption, that the competitor carries the activity in registered in the commercial register, and it is the employer’s burden to rebut this. So, it is worth considering the related costs in advance, and carefully draft the non-competition clause.
2. Limits of the prohibition
After the termination of the employment relationship, you should not restrict unjustly and excessively the gainful activity of your previous employee in terms of time and geographic area l.
For instance, you can’t prohibit generally to carry out a certain activity on a “worldwide level”, but a restriction for a country or a bigger region within that may be less likely invalid.
When it comes to duration, the non-compete agreement can be valid for 2 (two) years maximum from the termination of the employment.
3. Appropriate compensation
The central element of the non-compete agreement is the “appropriate compensation”.
Firstly, it is worth bearing in mind, that the compensation can be only money, therefore payment in kind, for instance taking a programme course is not an appropriate compensation according to the case-law.
You can pay the financial consideration monthly or you can pay up front the entire amount, but the sum of it for the whole non-compete agreement cannot be less than one third of the basic salary for the same period.
In addition, the compensation should be proportional. Consequently, a two-year agreement for one third of the base salary with a worldwide scope will be less likely proportionate and therefore valid. At the same time, a one-year restriction for half of the base salary with a scope of one country or a region within that will be presumably appropriate.
4. Changed circumstances
Sometimes more years pass between the conclusion of the agreement and the departure of the employee.
Thus, it can happen that the colleague, with whom you concluded a non-compete agreement by reason of “high-risk”, after years, due to market situation or technological change, does not mean real and serious threat for your company.
Unfortunately, the changed circumstances are irrelevant in relation to non-compete agreement.
Therefore you, as an employer, are obliged to pay the money laid down in the agreement even if it turns out later, that due to his abilities or for other reasons he cannot violate or threaten your economic interest.
5. The solution: right of withdrawal
In order to avoid the above situation, it is worth stipulating the right of withdrawal in the non-competition agreement at the beginning, which allows you to unilaterally terminate the agreement when the employee leaves your company.
By stipulating the right of withdrawal, you can make the non-competition agreement more flexible and cost-effective, because you maintain the opportunity to terminate it later unilaterally.
Any restrictions against leaving employees can be enforced on the basis of a valid non-compete agreement, therefore it is important to consider the above opinion of the Curia. In addition, it is worth turning to a lawyer, specialised in labour and business law, who can draft a non-compete agreement, custom-tailored to your company.
IS THE JUDGE BIASED BECAUSE OF UNFAVOURABLE JUDGMENT IN OTHER CASE?
Can a judge be disqualified from deciding the legal dispute on the grounds of bias if he has delivered a judgment unfavourable to the plaintiff in another case? Can a court be biased if the plaintiff has "challenged" a previous decision of the court before the European Court of Human Rights? In this article, we answer these questions by analysing a recent judgment of the Hungarian Supreme Court.Read more »
CAN INCOMPATIBLE WORKPLACE BEHAVIOUR BE A GROUND FOR DISMISSAL IN HUNGARY?
Refusal of employer 's instructions, unjustified absence, intentional damage: some cases where the justification for dismissing an employee is relatively easy to determine. What happens, however, if the employee does not commit a severe breach of duty similar to the one above, but his or her colleagues consider him incompatible, with whom it is impossible to cooperate, or even afraid of him or her. Can dismissal be justified by behaviour that is incompatible with others and creates disharmony in the working environment? In our article, we seek the answer to this question in the light of Hungarian judicial practice.Read more »
CAN A JUDICIAL ERROR CREATE HUNGARIAN JURISDICTION DESPITE A PLACE OF PERFORMANCE ABROAD?
Can a defendant, domiciled abroad, be sued in Hungary under the Brussels I Regulation in the event of defective performance of an international sales contract if the place of performance is abroad? Can the jurisdiction of a Hungarian court be established based on the fact that the lower court expressly established its jurisdiction at the beginning of the litigation? How is the EXW clause to be interpreted within the meaning of the Brussels I Regulation? In our article, we analyse the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Hungary.Read more »