Blog » WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF CHANGING YOUR SUPPLIER IN HUNGARY?
WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF CHANGING YOUR SUPPLIER IN HUNGARY?
06 March 2019
Changing your supplier is a common situation in business. Can you switch between suppliers without restrictions, if there is no fixed term or exclusive contract? Do you have to purchase from the supplier during the notice period? What are the risks of failing to give purchase orders? In our article, we answer the above questions by analysing the Hungarian judicial practice.
In which case the situation can occur?
In business, such situations are frequent when a customer regularly gives purchase orders to its supplier to manufacture products or provide services, without having fixed term or exclusive contract with the supplier. It is also common that suppliers undertake larger investments or hire new staff in order to perform those purchase orders continuously.
The question is, whether you, as a customer can decide to change your supplier in such cases. If so, are you obliged to purchase from the supplier during the notice period? What are the risks of using the service of your new supplier instead buying from the old one?
Should you purchase during the notice period?
The Hungarian court practice has a unified position regarding the above question. According to the decisions, contracts are still in force during the notice period, thus the parties must fulfil their contractual obligations. This means that during the notice period, you have to order the service or product from your old supplier.
In case the supplier is unable to perform the contract despite its will, because the customer simply does not request it or even obstructs the performance, it is considered as an impossibility of performance under the Civil Code.
Rulings confirm that the supplier will not be entitled to demand remuneration in the above case, since he did not perform the contract, however, you as a customer shall be liable for your contractual obligations and by not requesting or blocking the supplier's performance during the notice period, you breach the contract.
Liability for damages
In practice this means that if you do not ensure that the old supplier can perform the contract during the notice period, the supplier may claim the amount that he would have been earned if the contract was performed, as a lost profit.
The ruling in the following case highlights a further consequence.
The defendant was a supermarket chain, as customer, the applicant was a carrier. The customer expanded the order, so the supplier leased eight new vehicles to be able to perform. After that, the customer suddenly terminated the contract with immediate effect, so the main income source of the carrier was immediately cut instead of the four-month notice period. Due to the loss of the contract, the carrier was unable to pay the lease fee for the redundant "fleet", became insolvent in six months, finally, the business was liquidated.
The court found that the immediate termination by the supermarket was unlawful and in addition to awarding the carrier his lost profit for the term of the notice period, the Court also awarded the lease fee paid by the carrier for the fleet, in his favour, since the carrier could reasonably expect that the contract will remain in force for long term when he concluded the “fleet” lease contract,
Based on the Hungarian case law, it is clear that in the absence of an exclusivity clause, you as a customer can freely change your suppliers, however,
- you must provide your old supplier with purchase orders making him possible to perform the contract during the notice period
- failure to comply with the above constitutes a breach of contract resulting in a claim for damages by the supplier, claiming loss of profit and further damages.
In the light of the above, it is advisable to consult a legal professional before changing supplier to avoid unexpected risks.
Hungary: Steps Towards Differentiating Between Domestic and International Procedural Public Policy
Drawing a well-defined line of demarcation between domestic and international public policy when enforcing foreign arbitral awards sends a clear pro-arbitration message from national courts in any jurisdiction. Does Hungarian case law come close to this level of sophistication? This post analyses this question in the context of procedural public policy, and it does so based on two recent appellate court decisions rendered in the context of enforcement of arbitral awards in accordance with the New York Convention.Read more »
EU ISSUED NEW GDPR STANDARD CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES – WHEN AND HOW TO USE THEM?
During summer 2021, the European Commission published two new "standard contractual clauses" on data protection regulation, which can be applied on the one hand, to the legal relationship between data controllers and data processors covered by the GDPR , and to the transfers of personal data to third countries, on the other. In this article, we answer the questions: what these SCCs regulate, how do they differ from the previous SCCs and how can your company use the new SCCs?Read more »
CAN THE NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT BE VALID WITHOUT A PRECISE COMPENSATION IN HUNGARY?
The non-compete agreement may provide protection of the legitimate economic interests of the employer even after the termination of employment relationship. However, the Hungarian Labour Code lays down strict requirements for the agreement. In our article we analyse a recent decision of the Supreme Court about the importance of the precise determination of the compensation, so you as an employer can conclude a valid non-compete agreement.Read more »